Research Article

Impact of Surface Treatments on the Roughness Surface and Fracture Pattern of Zirconia Ceramic Restorations

S. Benfaida
Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco
* Corresponding author
H. Moussaoui
Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco
Zineb Bahir
Private Practice, Casablanca, Morocco
Anas Bennani
Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco
DOI icon 10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.2.171

Read Counter
108

Downloads
137

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-02-18
Published 2022-03-22

Read counter = 108 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the surface roughness, and fracture pattern of zirconia ceramic restorations after the application of different surface treatments.

Material and method: We conducted a systematic literature search on the electronic databases PubMed and Science direct using 12 key words via Boolean equations. We identified articles that met the eligibility criteria by checking the title and abstract. A full-text review was used to select articles based on the CASP grid. (The Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)

Results: 13 articles were selected after reading the full text. We noted a predominance of mixed failure in our study.

Conclusion: Sandblasting before sintering is a recommended method to increase surface roughness and improve the bond strength of the cosmetic ceramic. The mixed fracture mode is the most frequent mode in our study. Further clinical studies with standardization of protocols should be conducted.

Keywords: Fracture, surface roughness, surface treatments, zirconia

References

  1. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CHF. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2007; 20: 383-388.
     Google Scholar
  2. Pjetursson BE, Valente NA, Strasding M, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Sailer I. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns, Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 16: 199-214.
     Google Scholar
  3. Mosharraf R, Rismanchian M, Savabi O, Ashtiani AH. Influence of surface modification techniques on shear bond strength between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3: 221-228.
     Google Scholar
  4. Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Yi YJ, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han J. Sand all Effect of surface treatment and liner material on the adhesion between veneering ceramic and zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 40: 369-374.
     Google Scholar
  5. Ji M, Lee J, Yim E. Effect of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Shear Bond Strength Between Zirconia and Dental Porcelain Veneer. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2020; 20: 56835685.
     Google Scholar
  6. Abdullah AO, Pollington S, Fenik KM. Effect of repeated laser surface treatments on shear bond strength between zirconia and veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 338.e1-338.e6.
     Google Scholar
  7. Liua Y, Hsieha J, Chena Y. Promoting porcelain–zirconia bonding using different atmospheric pressure gas plasmas. Dent Materials. 2018; 34: 1188-1198.
     Google Scholar
  8. He M, Zhang Z, Zheng D. Effect of sandblasting on surface roughness of zirconia-based ceramics and shear bond strength of veneering porcelain. Dental Materials Journal. 2014; 33(6): 778–785.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kim HJ, Lim HP, Park YJ Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105: 315322
     Google Scholar
  10. Bitencourt SB, dos Santos DM, da Silva EVF. Characterisation of a new plasma-enhanced film to improve shear bond strength between zirconia and veneering ceramic. Materials Science & Engineering C. 2018, 92: 196-205.
     Google Scholar
  11. Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Yi YJ, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han J. Sand all Effect of various intermediate ceramic layers on the interfacial stability of zirconia core and veneering ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015; 73: 488- 495.
     Google Scholar
  12. Sasany R, Koca M, Koroglu CG. Effect of Potassium Nitrate and Boric Acid on the Bond Strength of Veneering Ceramics to Zirconia.The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2020; 28: 182–188.
     Google Scholar
  13. Spintzyk S, Yamaguchi K, Sawada T, Schille C, Schweizer E, Ozeki M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Influence of the Conditioning Method for Pre-Sintered Zirconia on the Shear Bond Strength of Bilayered Porcelain/Zirconia. Materials. 2016; 9: 765.
     Google Scholar
  14. Nishigori A, Yoshida T, Bottino MC. Influence of zirconia surface treatment on veneering porcelain shear bond strength after cyclic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1392-1398.
     Google Scholar
  15. Yamamoto LT, Rodrigues VA, Dornelles LS, Low-fusing porcelain glaze application on 3Y-TZP surfaces can enhance zirconia-porcelain adhesion. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27: 543-547.
     Google Scholar
  16. Gostemeyer G, Jendras M, Dittmer MP, Influence of cooling rate on zirconia/veneer interfacial adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 4532–4538.
     Google Scholar
  17. Benetti P, Della Bona A, Kelly JR. Evaluation of thermal compatibility between core and veneer dental ceramics using shear bond strength test and contact angle measurement. Dent Mater. 2010; 26: 743–750.
     Google Scholar
  18. Gattass RR, Mazur E. Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials. Nat Photon. 2008; 2: 219–225.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)